Creator

Date

2000-05-22

Description

Comment: 3 pages in RevTex, no figure

It has been derived that the Sommerfeld coefficient $\gamma $ as large as 25

J/K$^2$mol can be theoretically accounted for provided the charge f-electron

fluctuations are substantially suppressed. This result enables the

understanding of the heavy-fermion YbBiPt ($\gamma $ =8 J/K$^2$mol) as the spin

fluctuator and should stimulate the experimental specific-heat research at low

temperatures.

J/K$^2$mol can be theoretically accounted for provided the charge f-electron

fluctuations are substantially suppressed. This result enables the

understanding of the heavy-fermion YbBiPt ($\gamma $ =8 J/K$^2$mol) as the spin

fluctuator and should stimulate the experimental specific-heat research at low

temperatures.

Type

Database

Link to record

Show preview

Hide preview

ar
X

iv :c

on d-

m at

/0 00

53 63

v1 [

co nd

-m at.

str -el

] 22

M ay

20 00

Giant Sommerfeld coefficient in the heavy-fermion YbBiPt

Z. Ropka

Center for Solid State Physics, s´w. Filip 5, 31-150 Krako´w, Poland.

email: sfradwan@cyf-kr.edu.pl

It has been derived that the Sommerfeld coefficient γ as large as 25

J/K2mol can be theoretically accounted for provided the charge f-electron

fluctuations are substantially suppressed. This result enables the understand-

ing of the heavy-fermion YbBiPt (γ =8 J/K2mol) as the spin fluctuator and

should stimulate the experimental specific-heat research at low temperatures.

PACS No: 71.28; 65.20.

Keywords: strongly-correlated electron systems, heavy-fermion systems,

YbBiPt

In 1991 Fisk et al. [1] discovered that YbBiPt has the linear-temperature specific-heat

coefficient (Sommerfeld coefficient) γ of 8 J/K2mol. It is the largest value measured up

to now - in the highest heavy-fermion systems a value up to 1.6 J/K2mol has been found

(CeAl3). The origin of such the giant value is still the subject of extensive theoretical studies

and long-lasting discussions [1-5]. In fact, this discussion concentrates on the role played by

4f electrons and the way how to treat them. One school considers the f electrons as the part

of the core whereas the second one treats them as itinerant band–like electrons.

The aim of this Letter is to show that a giant value of 25 J/K2mol for the Sommerfeld

coefficient can be derived using the method described in Ref. 2 provided the charge f-electron

fluctuations are strongly suppressed.

In the theoretical paper of Ref. 2 it has been concluded that the band-structure LSDA+U

calculations provide the single-particle density of states that i) is peak-like at the Fermi level

EF and ii) its value of about 200 states per eV yields the Sommerfeld coefficient γ of 0.25

J/K2mol. Moreover, in order to make this value closer to the experimental one of 8 J/K2mol

in Ref. 2 iii) an enhancement by the factor (1-nf) −1 has been invoked. This factor has been

introduced to the charge-fluctuation model for heavy-fermion phenomena in Ref. 4 and is

1

due to the suppression of the f occupation fluctuations. In Ref. 2 the nf has been assumed

as 0.9. It increases the bare LSDA+U Sommerfeld-coefficient value by factor of 10 to 2.5

J/K2mol. The large density of states at EF in the heavy-fermion system YbBiPt found in

Ref. 1 has been recently confirmed by the ab initio self-interaction correction to the local-

spin density approximation (SIC-LSDA) calculations of Temmerman et al. [7], though in

this approximation the f electrons are not part of the core.

According to me in the approach described in Ref. 2 there is no justification for the

assumed value of 0.9 for nf . In fact, basing on the original approach to YbBiPt [1] the value

of nf of 0.99 seems to be much more realistic. It is also in agreement with the suppresion of

the charge fluctuations already in temperatures above 10 K where the full trivalent ytterbium

moment is seen in the susceptibility vs temperature plot [1,3]. Such the value for nf yields

so giant Sommerfeld coefficient as 25 J/K2mol. I predict that such the large Sommerfeld-

coefficient value will be experimentally detected for ytterbium/cerium/samarium systems

with the characteristic temperatures below 0.1 K. (In YbBiPt the Sommerfeld coefficient of

8 J/K2mol occurs below 0.4 K). Values of such order has been found already for 3He below

0.2 K [8,9].

In conclusion, I have derived that the Sommerfeld coefficient as large as 25 J/K2mol can

be theoretically accounted for provided the charge f-electron fluctuations are substantially

suppressed. This result enables the understanding of the heavy-fermion YbBiPt (γ =8

J/K2mol) as almost spin-fluctuating system (the f electrons are part of the core) and should

stimulate the experimental specific-heat research at low temperatures. According to Refs

5 and 6 these spin fluctuations are related with the atomic scale Kramers doublet ground

state of the trivalent ytterbium ions.

[1] Z.Fisk, P.C.Canfield, W.P.Beyermann, J.D.Thompson, M.F.Hundley, H.R. Ott, E.Felder,

M.B.Maple, M.A.Lopez de la Torre, P.Visani and C.L.Seaman, Phys.Rev.Lett. 67 (1991) 3310.

2

[2] P.M.Oppeneer, V.N.Antonov, A.N.Yaresko, A.Ya.Perlov and H.Eschring, Phys.Rev.Lett. 78

(1997) 4079.

[3] R.A.Robinson, M.Kohgi, T.Osakabe, F.Trouw, J.W.Lynn, P.C.Canfield, J.D.Thompson, Z.Fisk

and W.P.Beyermann, Phys.Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1194.

[4] P.Fulde, J.Keller and G.Zwicknagl, Solid State Phys. 41 (1988) 1.

[5] R.J.Radwanski, in: Condensed Matter Studies by Nuclear Methods, K.Tomala and E.A.Gorlich

eds (Jagiellonian Univ. Press 1995) p. 435.

[6] R.J.Radwanski - Formation of the heavy-fermion state - an explanation in a model traditionally

called localized, http:/xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9906287.

[7] W.M.Temmerman, Z.Szotek, A.Svane, P.Strange, H.Winter, A.Delin, B.Johansson,

O.Erriksson, L.Fast and J.M.Wills, Phys.Rev.Lett. 83 (1999) 3900.

[8] D.F.Brewer, J.G.Daunt and A.K.Sreedhar, Phys.Rev. 115 (1959) 836.

[9] A.C.Anderson, W.Reese and J.C.Wheatley, Phys.Rev. 130 (1963) 495.

3

iv :c

on d-

m at

/0 00

53 63

v1 [

co nd

-m at.

str -el

] 22

M ay

20 00

Giant Sommerfeld coefficient in the heavy-fermion YbBiPt

Z. Ropka

Center for Solid State Physics, s´w. Filip 5, 31-150 Krako´w, Poland.

email: sfradwan@cyf-kr.edu.pl

It has been derived that the Sommerfeld coefficient γ as large as 25

J/K2mol can be theoretically accounted for provided the charge f-electron

fluctuations are substantially suppressed. This result enables the understand-

ing of the heavy-fermion YbBiPt (γ =8 J/K2mol) as the spin fluctuator and

should stimulate the experimental specific-heat research at low temperatures.

PACS No: 71.28; 65.20.

Keywords: strongly-correlated electron systems, heavy-fermion systems,

YbBiPt

In 1991 Fisk et al. [1] discovered that YbBiPt has the linear-temperature specific-heat

coefficient (Sommerfeld coefficient) γ of 8 J/K2mol. It is the largest value measured up

to now - in the highest heavy-fermion systems a value up to 1.6 J/K2mol has been found

(CeAl3). The origin of such the giant value is still the subject of extensive theoretical studies

and long-lasting discussions [1-5]. In fact, this discussion concentrates on the role played by

4f electrons and the way how to treat them. One school considers the f electrons as the part

of the core whereas the second one treats them as itinerant band–like electrons.

The aim of this Letter is to show that a giant value of 25 J/K2mol for the Sommerfeld

coefficient can be derived using the method described in Ref. 2 provided the charge f-electron

fluctuations are strongly suppressed.

In the theoretical paper of Ref. 2 it has been concluded that the band-structure LSDA+U

calculations provide the single-particle density of states that i) is peak-like at the Fermi level

EF and ii) its value of about 200 states per eV yields the Sommerfeld coefficient γ of 0.25

J/K2mol. Moreover, in order to make this value closer to the experimental one of 8 J/K2mol

in Ref. 2 iii) an enhancement by the factor (1-nf) −1 has been invoked. This factor has been

introduced to the charge-fluctuation model for heavy-fermion phenomena in Ref. 4 and is

1

due to the suppression of the f occupation fluctuations. In Ref. 2 the nf has been assumed

as 0.9. It increases the bare LSDA+U Sommerfeld-coefficient value by factor of 10 to 2.5

J/K2mol. The large density of states at EF in the heavy-fermion system YbBiPt found in

Ref. 1 has been recently confirmed by the ab initio self-interaction correction to the local-

spin density approximation (SIC-LSDA) calculations of Temmerman et al. [7], though in

this approximation the f electrons are not part of the core.

According to me in the approach described in Ref. 2 there is no justification for the

assumed value of 0.9 for nf . In fact, basing on the original approach to YbBiPt [1] the value

of nf of 0.99 seems to be much more realistic. It is also in agreement with the suppresion of

the charge fluctuations already in temperatures above 10 K where the full trivalent ytterbium

moment is seen in the susceptibility vs temperature plot [1,3]. Such the value for nf yields

so giant Sommerfeld coefficient as 25 J/K2mol. I predict that such the large Sommerfeld-

coefficient value will be experimentally detected for ytterbium/cerium/samarium systems

with the characteristic temperatures below 0.1 K. (In YbBiPt the Sommerfeld coefficient of

8 J/K2mol occurs below 0.4 K). Values of such order has been found already for 3He below

0.2 K [8,9].

In conclusion, I have derived that the Sommerfeld coefficient as large as 25 J/K2mol can

be theoretically accounted for provided the charge f-electron fluctuations are substantially

suppressed. This result enables the understanding of the heavy-fermion YbBiPt (γ =8

J/K2mol) as almost spin-fluctuating system (the f electrons are part of the core) and should

stimulate the experimental specific-heat research at low temperatures. According to Refs

5 and 6 these spin fluctuations are related with the atomic scale Kramers doublet ground

state of the trivalent ytterbium ions.

[1] Z.Fisk, P.C.Canfield, W.P.Beyermann, J.D.Thompson, M.F.Hundley, H.R. Ott, E.Felder,

M.B.Maple, M.A.Lopez de la Torre, P.Visani and C.L.Seaman, Phys.Rev.Lett. 67 (1991) 3310.

2

[2] P.M.Oppeneer, V.N.Antonov, A.N.Yaresko, A.Ya.Perlov and H.Eschring, Phys.Rev.Lett. 78

(1997) 4079.

[3] R.A.Robinson, M.Kohgi, T.Osakabe, F.Trouw, J.W.Lynn, P.C.Canfield, J.D.Thompson, Z.Fisk

and W.P.Beyermann, Phys.Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1194.

[4] P.Fulde, J.Keller and G.Zwicknagl, Solid State Phys. 41 (1988) 1.

[5] R.J.Radwanski, in: Condensed Matter Studies by Nuclear Methods, K.Tomala and E.A.Gorlich

eds (Jagiellonian Univ. Press 1995) p. 435.

[6] R.J.Radwanski - Formation of the heavy-fermion state - an explanation in a model traditionally

called localized, http:/xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9906287.

[7] W.M.Temmerman, Z.Szotek, A.Svane, P.Strange, H.Winter, A.Delin, B.Johansson,

O.Erriksson, L.Fast and J.M.Wills, Phys.Rev.Lett. 83 (1999) 3900.

[8] D.F.Brewer, J.G.Daunt and A.K.Sreedhar, Phys.Rev. 115 (1959) 836.

[9] A.C.Anderson, W.Reese and J.C.Wheatley, Phys.Rev. 130 (1963) 495.

3

Comments